Many feel there is nothing that can be done to protect our large population in advance of an unknown threat, so better to organize for handling mass casualties and mass evacuation after it happens. Their view is that with minimum civil defense training and some basic advance preparation, most people can survive almost any calamity, including a nuclear attack, and go on to rebuild a new life.įEMA views its role as a facilitator of emergency response after a natural catastrophe has happened. This is not the attitude of most other governments. This is not only untrue, but borders on a premeditated form of national suicide. It is the public’s attitude that survival preparation is somehow a waste of time because life would not be worth living after a nuclear attack. Our government has taken the position that it would be impossible to construct enough government-funded shelters to protect all United States citizens, and even if it did there is the belief that most of these shelters could not provide enough protection and would not be properly maintained. FEMA is not in the business of promoting self-preservation or shelter construction. However, if you followed up by trying to learn more about civil defense in the United States you soon found out the dirty little secretthere isn’t a national civil defense program in the United States today.Īfter our National Civil Defense Program died a quiet death in the 1970s, the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) took its place, but with an entirely different set of goals. After September 11, 2001, all of us became much more concerned with protecting our families from biological, nuclear, and terrorist attacks.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |